Guns: Girl’s Defense Against Rapes

Rape attacks on girls are very common in India. It is the history of this country as evidenced by the rape of Draupadi by his own brother in laws inside the royal court! Recently many such cases were reported in North India, especially in Uttar Pradesh (the recent Unnao rape case), Haryana, Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir (the recent horrific Kathua rape case). In all these cases, the state officials did nothing to stop the incidents or give justice to the victims. In many cases the police itself is involved in raping or killing of rape victim relatives!

Since ages these violent aggressive attacks are taking place on girls’ bodies, which is their private property, and state officials are doing nothing. They are doing nothing because they are designed to do nothing when it comes to protecting the private property of citizens. It is an age old myth being perpetrated by the state officials to legitimize their hegemonic rule over people that they exist to protect the life, liberty and property of people. In reality, they exist for their own protection and survival e.g., just take a look at the hordes of black cat commandos protecting politicians or the manner in which the judiciary system works hard to protect politicians and their cronies.

All these events should be enough to wake-up the sleeping populace, especially girls who are frequent victims of these violent aggression. Girls must realize that the system is not going to protect them. They should understand that they must take the matter of their life’s security in their own hands. Unless they start protecting themselves, their life will never be safe. Relying on state officials for the safety of our private property is foolish because state is the biggest violator of private property rights in the history of mankind. State’s very existence is based on violation of private property i.e., tax robbery! State safeguarding our private property is like wolves protecting a hen house!

If enough girls and people realize above fact then there is one sure way of protecting oneself against these physical aggression. That sure way is, gun ownership. Guns will be one of the biggest defense tools in the hands of girls. Empirical studies conducted by Professor John Lott show that in a country where citizens own more guns, there are less crimes. Because owning guns for the citizens is illegal in India – a trick of state officials to make us defenseless against their exploitation – girls should start applying en masse for gun licenses citing risks to their lives in this lawless country as the primary reason. This movement of applying for gun ownership en masse can start the ball rolling and people can then start discussing the very important issue of all citizens’ owning guns for defense of their private property against violent aggressions from the parasitic class of the Indian society.

Owning a gun will surely not solve all of the problems which girls are facing, but, at least, they will have some solid means available in their hands for protecting their lives instead of relying on the state system, which doesn’t really care.

Surely private gun ownership is an issue that Indians hardly discuss. But then we need to break free of the status quo thinking, and actively start searching for better alternatives of defending our private property. One of the best alternative systems of defending our private property is the system of private production of defense and judiciary services. As long as people will not look for and understand better alternative ideas, things will never improve. Unless we take our security in our own hands, the state will continue to exploit us, and our daughters, mothers, sisters etc., will continue to be raped and attacked.

2 thoughts on “Guns: Girl’s Defense Against Rapes

  1. PI says:

    Regarding “It is the history of this country as evidenced by the rape of Draupadi by his own brother in laws inside the royal court”.

    While agreeing with free gun laws as s means to empower the entity,
    the INDIVIDUAL, the opposite of the mob (India is an Ochlocracy, mob rule. Mobs are formed by chrushing of it’s logical opposite the individual) I would not be very sure if Rapes have increased. To make a statement that Rapes have increased is notoriously difficult, as Rapes could be under or over reported and can be under or over registered.
    I feel the most reliable indicator of increase of rapes is increase in homicide rate – as a pretty good record is kept of number of dead bodies(except in times of war). My reasonable assumption is strong correlation between number of homicides and number of rapes, as both are criminal activity exists(Cannot be proven). Indeed the number of homicides per thousand registered a dramatic drop after 1991 globalization by Narasimha Rao

    Mahabharatha is a story. The British Bureaucracy, brilliantly exploited Ekalavya THUMB myth, by not dispeling the neo-myth that East India Company had cut thumbs of Dacca muslin Weavers in order to seize power from private business, the East India Company..

    India eats and drinks myths because it is a pseudo-democracy. Parliament has emancipated itself from democracy by the vehicle of reservation policy as STABLE vote banks are formed. It is no longer individual who votes but vote banks which votes.

    Free and Fair Elections
    —————
    Sane voices in India don’t stand a chance because Indian elections can at best be fair, but not FREE. Anybody has to agree to secularism and socialism (introduced into constitution during emergency) to start a new party. Marvellous in intention(even ignoring the fact that socialism and welfare state has produced ONLY mass murder), but wait a minute, both secularism and socialism are ideologies – and it is well known ideologies can turn into it’s opposite.

    Thus strangely secularism can turn into a new religion. Lo behold the spectacle of Yediyurappa shifting Vidhana Soudha into a chamber of Siddganga Mutt (most of free time he was in the Mutt). Congress on the other hand is shifting all the mutts into a chamber of Vidhana Soudha!!

    Logically conditional freedom is opposite of freedom, especially in human affairs. All restriction on starting of political parties should be removed trusting wisdom of voters.

    Is freedom or the constitution parent? Since many countries like Britain don’t have a constitution ( like some people don’t have children) clearly freedom is parent.

    I HOPE YOU USE DISQUS ENGINE FOR COMMENTS AS IT IS VERY CONVENIENT and very POPULAR TOO.

    • PI says:

      Like religion (unlike very ancient religions), Constitution excludes people who do not believe (believe in secularism!! ) – by denying unconditional freedom to start a political party.

      That is why constitutional secularism was by definition religion and is becoming more and more obvious as days pass. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HAS BECOME A CULT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: